Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs ATI Radeon X300

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
Gen. 9.5
Rage 9
GPU code name
Market segment
Launch date
1 October 2017 (3 years ago)
1 September 2004 (16 years ago)
Price now

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
375 MHz
Boost clock speed
1200 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
no data
107 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
110 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt
36 Watt
Texture fill rate

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 1.0 x16


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64 MB
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
no data
400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
no data
6.4 GB/s
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video


Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (12_1)
Shader Model
no data

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P630

Much newer (1 October 2017 vs 1 September 2004)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 110 nm)

Lower power consumption (15W vs 36W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of ATI Radeon X300

Cheaper ($51 vs $1048)

Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between Intel UHD Graphics P630 and ATI Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics P630
ATI Radeon X300

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.