UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
1.95

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 17% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking854810
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code nameGen. 11Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years old)30 March 2021 (2 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Wattno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1.95
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2.28
+16.9%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 17% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6317
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 7190
+13.8%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 14% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 1654
+4.1%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 4% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 1203
+18.4%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 18% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6977
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 7982
+14.4%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 14% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 72158
+11.5%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 64701

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by 12% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−37.5%
11
+37.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 1
−700%
8
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−133%
7
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 1
−600%
7
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−125%
9
+125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 1
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−66.7%
5
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 37.5% faster than UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 14.3% faster than the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 700% faster than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU).

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 25 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (46%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.95 2.28
Recency 11 January 2021 30 March 2021

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 334 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.