Radeon RX 9070 XT vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.72

RX 9070 XT outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 3374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.02
Power efficiency13.6715.62
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGen. 11Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324096
Core clock speed350 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rateno data760.3
Floating-point processing powerno data48.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−3275%
270−280
+3275%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−31200%
300−350
+31200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3950%
160−170
+3950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−31200%
300−350
+31200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3950%
160−170
+3950%
Far Cry 5 1
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Fortnite 8−9
−3675%
300−350
+3675%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2440%
250−260
+2440%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−9250%
180−190
+9250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
Valorant 35−40
−855%
350−400
+855%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−31200%
300−350
+31200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−632%
270−280
+632%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3950%
160−170
+3950%
Dota 2 12
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Far Cry 5 1
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Fortnite 8−9
−3675%
300−350
+3675%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2440%
250−260
+2440%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−9250%
180−190
+9250%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
−8250%
160−170
+8250%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5333%
160−170
+5333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−6625%
260−270
+6625%
Valorant 35−40
−855%
350−400
+855%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3380%
170−180
+3380%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3950%
160−170
+3950%
Dota 2 11
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Far Cry 5 1
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2440%
250−260
+2440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−8867%
260−270
+8867%
Valorant 35−40
−855%
350−400
+855%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−3675%
300−350
+3675%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−19500%
190−200
+19500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−3723%
450−500
+3723%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 130−140
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−929%
170−180
+929%
Valorant 12−14
−3292%
400−450
+3292%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9100%
90−95
+9100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−7650%
150−160
+7650%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5350%
210−220
+5350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−4933%
150−160
+4933%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5800%
55−60
+5800%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−947%
150−160
+947%
Valorant 10−11
−3210%
300−350
+3210%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Dota 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5000%
100−110
+5000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 3275% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 31200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is ahead in 50 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.72 59.75
Recency 11 January 2021 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 304 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 7500% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 3373.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
R7 (Carrizo) Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
RTX 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RX 9070 XT 9070 XT
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RX 9070 9070
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 939 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.