Radeon RX 9070 XT vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.
RX 9070 XT outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 2951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 872 | 25 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 60.98 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.77 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Navi 48 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 6 March 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1660 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 2970 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 53,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 304 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 760.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 48.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 128 |
| TMUs | no data | 256 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2518 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 644.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 11
−1845%
| 214
+1845%
|
| 1440p | 4−5
−3225%
| 133
+3225%
|
| 4K | 2−3
−4150%
| 85
+4150%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 2.80 |
| 1440p | no data | 4.50 |
| 4K | no data | 7.05 |
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 23
−1265%
|
300−350
+1265%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4000%
|
160−170
+4000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−4367%
|
268
+4367%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10
−1650%
|
170−180
+1650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 17
−1747%
|
300−350
+1747%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4000%
|
160−170
+4000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
−3600%
|
296
+3600%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
−2920%
|
300−350
+2920%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−2236%
|
250−260
+2236%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 9
−2000%
|
180−190
+2000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−3883%
|
239
+3883%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1500%
|
170−180
+1500%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−823%
|
350−400
+823%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−2817%
|
170−180
+2817%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5
−6180%
|
300−350
+6180%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−547%
|
270−280
+547%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4000%
|
160−170
+4000%
|
| Dota 2 | 23
−2943%
|
700−750
+2943%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7
−3971%
|
285
+3971%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
−2920%
|
300−350
+2920%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−2236%
|
250−260
+2236%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−9350%
|
180−190
+9350%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
−2700%
|
160−170
+2700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−3117%
|
193
+3117%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−4025%
|
160−170
+4025%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1500%
|
170−180
+1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
−5422%
|
497
+5422%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−823%
|
350−400
+823%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−2817%
|
170−180
+2817%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4000%
|
160−170
+4000%
|
| Dota 2 | 22
−2855%
|
650−700
+2855%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−6650%
|
270
+6650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−2236%
|
250−260
+2236%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−2333%
|
146
+2333%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1500%
|
170−180
+1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
−5420%
|
276
+5420%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−823%
|
350−400
+823%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
−2920%
|
300−350
+2920%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−9850%
|
190−200
+9850%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−3260%
|
500−550
+3260%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−1067%
|
170−180
+1067%
|
| Valorant | 18−20
−2411%
|
450−500
+2411%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−9200%
|
90−95
+9200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−4233%
|
260
+4233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−4340%
|
220−230
+4340%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
−5700%
|
116
+5700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−5200%
|
212
+5200%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−3675%
|
150−160
+3675%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−960%
|
150−160
+960%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
−2909%
|
300−350
+2909%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| Dota 2 | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−3700%
|
152
+3700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−17300%
|
170−180
+17300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−3100%
|
95−100
+3100%
|
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2533%
|
75−80
+2533%
|
| Metro Exodus | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 174
+0%
|
174
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 68
+0%
|
68
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:
- RX 9070 XT is 1845% faster in 1080p
- RX 9070 XT is 3225% faster in 1440p
- RX 9070 XT is 4150% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 17300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 9070 XT is ahead in 52 tests (85%)
- there's a draw in 9 tests (15%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.22 | 67.74 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 6 March 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
RX 9070 XT has a 2951.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
