Radeon RX 9070 XT vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
2021
3.71

RX 9070 XT outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs by a whopping 1526% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69628
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.61
Power efficiencyno data15.70
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324096
Core clock speed350 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data304 Watt
Texture fill rateno data760.3
Floating-point processing powerno data48.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−1238%
214
+1238%
1440p8−9
−1563%
133
+1563%
4K5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.80
1440pno data4.50
4Kno data7.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18
−867%
170−180
+867%
Far Cry 5 14
−2014%
296
+2014%
Fortnite 21−24
−1213%
300−350
+1213%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1242%
250−260
+1242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−941%
170−180
+941%
Valorant 50−55
−576%
350−400
+576%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−988%
170−180
+988%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−292%
270−280
+292%
Dota 2 34
−1518%
550−600
+1518%
Far Cry 5 13
−2092%
285
+2092%
Fortnite 21−24
−1213%
300−350
+1213%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1242%
250−260
+1242%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−1192%
160−170
+1192%
Metro Exodus 6
−2633%
160−170
+2633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−941%
170−180
+941%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−4042%
497
+4042%
Valorant 50−55
−576%
350−400
+576%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−1060%
170−180
+1060%
Dota 2 31
−1513%
500−550
+1513%
Far Cry 5 12
−2150%
270
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1242%
250−260
+1242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−941%
170−180
+941%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2200%
276
+2200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−1213%
300−350
+1213%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−1563%
450−500
+1563%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−3300%
130−140
+3300%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3533%
100−110
+3533%
Valorant 40−45
−933%
400−450
+933%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16200%
160−170
+16200%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−2500%
260
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−881%
150−160
+881%
Valorant 20−22
−1555%
300−350
+1555%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−1515%
210−220
+1515%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2940%
152
+2940%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3340%
170−180
+3340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 268
+0%
268
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 239
+0%
239
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 146
+0%
146
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 116
+0%
116
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 212
+0%
212
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+0%
174
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 68
+0%
68
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 1238% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 1563% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 16200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is ahead in 36 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.71 60.31
Recency 30 March 2021 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

RX 9070 XT has a 1525.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RX 6800M RX 6800M
vs
RX 9070 XT 9070 XT
RX 6800M RX 6800M
vs
RX 9070 9070
RX 6800M RX 6800M
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1072 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.