Arc B570 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) with Arc B570, including specs and performance data.
Arc B570 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 2590% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1059 | 163 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 85.04 |
| Power efficiency | 9.60 | 17.22 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 (2021) | Xe2 (2024) |
| GPU code name | Gen. 11 | BMG-G21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) | 16 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $219 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 19,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.8 - 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 360.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 80 |
| TMUs | no data | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 18 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 272 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 380.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8
−2525%
| 210−220
+2525%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 1.04 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2567%
|
240−250
+2567%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−2476%
|
850−900
+2476%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18
−2400%
|
450−500
+2400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Dota 2 | 12
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2567%
|
240−250
+2567%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−2471%
|
180−190
+2471%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−2476%
|
850−900
+2476%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Dota 2 | 11
−2536%
|
290−300
+2536%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2567%
|
240−250
+2567%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−2471%
|
180−190
+2471%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−2476%
|
850−900
+2476%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−2208%
|
300−310
+2208%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−2471%
|
180−190
+2471%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| God of War | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and Arc B570 compete in popular games:
- Arc B570 is 2525% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.26 | 33.89 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 16 January 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 150 Watt |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has 3650% lower power consumption.
Arc B570, on the other hand, has a 2589.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc B570 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook graphics card while Arc B570 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
