H200 SXM 141 GB vs STG-2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataHopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV1GH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16896
Core clock speed75 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors1 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate0.081,045
Floating-point processing powerno data66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs124
TMUs1528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMHBM3e
Maximum RAM amount1 MB141 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s3.36 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 141 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 700 Watt

STG-2000 has 34900% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 29 years, a 14438300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG-2000 and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG-2000 is a desktop card while H200 SXM 141 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 68 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.