Arc B570 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Arc B570, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
2.24

Arc B570 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 1361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking862163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.56
Power efficiencyno data15.53
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Xe2 (2025)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed350 MHz2500 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data360.0
Floating-point processing powerno data11.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data380.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−1355%
160−170
+1355%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.37

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Metro Exodus 7
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Valorant 8
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Dota 2 12
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Far Cry 5 15
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Fortnite 12−14
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Metro Exodus 4
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Valorant 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45
−1295%
600−650
+1295%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Dota 2 22
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
World of Tanks 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Valorant 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Dota 2 16−18
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Fortnite 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Arc B570 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B570 is 1355% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.24 32.73
Recency 30 March 2021 16 January 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

Arc B570 has a 1361.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B570 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while Arc B570 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel Arc B570
Arc B570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 363 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 54 votes

Rate Arc B570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.