Arc A550M vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.18

Arc A550M outperforms UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) by a whopping 872% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Arc A550M Arc A550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking845240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.7027.99
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642048
Core clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data262.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.397 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 2.18
Arc A550M 21.19
+872%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 1296
Arc A550M 14350
+1008%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−823%
120−130
+823%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−950%
60−65
+950%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2560%
130−140
+2560%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−950%
60−65
+950%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1214%
90−95
+1214%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2560%
130−140
+2560%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Fortnite 10−12
−945%
110−120
+945%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−667%
90−95
+667%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Valorant 40−45
−283%
160−170
+283%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−950%
60−65
+950%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1214%
90−95
+1214%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2560%
130−140
+2560%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−448%
250−260
+448%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Dota 2 15
−700%
120−130
+700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Fortnite 10−12
−945%
110−120
+945%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−667%
90−95
+667%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1300%
80−85
+1300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
Valorant 40−45
−283%
160−170
+283%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1214%
90−95
+1214%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Dota 2 15
−700%
120−130
+700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1825%
75−80
+1825%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−667%
90−95
+667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
Valorant 40−45
−283%
160−170
+283%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−945%
110−120
+945%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−859%
160−170
+859%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−729%
170−180
+729%
Valorant 20−22
−900%
200−210
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1667%
50−55
+1667%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−187%
40−45
+187%
Valorant 12−14
−1017%
130−140
+1017%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A550M is 823% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A550M is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A550M is ahead in 56 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.18 21.19
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 60 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has 757.1% lower power consumption.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 872% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
R7 450 OEM R7 450 OEM
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU Pro 19-Core GPU
Xbox Series X GPU Xbox Series X GPU
vs
RX 6550M RX 6550M
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Max-Q
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G4
vs
B200 SXM 192 GB SXM 192 GB
Jetson Nano GPU Jetson Nano GPU
vs
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
vs
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
A100 PCIe A100 PCIe
vs
GTX 980MX GTX 980MX
GTX 1650 TU116 GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
vs
ATI HD 4200 HD 4200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.