GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) with GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
2021
4 Watt
0.97

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 3943% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1143121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.4059.82
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGen. 11GB207
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed250 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz2520 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data12.9 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5
−3900%
200−210
+3900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
God of War 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−6200%
120−130
+6200%
Fortnite 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2450%
150−160
+2450%
God of War 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1622%
150−160
+1622%
Valorant 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−1058%
270−280
+1058%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Dota 2 6
−3900%
240−250
+3900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−6200%
120−130
+6200%
Fortnite 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2450%
150−160
+2450%
God of War 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1622%
150−160
+1622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2267%
140−150
+2267%
Valorant 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Dota 2 5
−3900%
200−210
+3900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−6200%
120−130
+6200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2450%
150−160
+2450%
God of War 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1622%
150−160
+1622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2267%
140−150
+2267%
Valorant 30−35
−3932%
1250−1300
+3932%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−4517%
270−280
+4517%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−3900%
400−450
+3900%
Valorant 0−1 260−270

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 95−100
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3700%
110−120
+3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 75−80

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−473%
85−90
+473%
Valorant 5−6
−4740%
240−250
+4740%

4K
Ultra Preset

God of War 0−1 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
God of War 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile is 3900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 17000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5050 Mobile performs better in 34 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 21 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 39.22
Recency 11 January 2021 24 June 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 50 Watt

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) has 1150% lower power consumption.

RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3943.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 85 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) or GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.