Radeon Pro W6600M vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	660	222
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.84	19.09
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	1792
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1224 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2034 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	227.8
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	16	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.49

Pro W6600M 24.68
+450%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

Pro W6600M 9521
+449%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −936%	110−120 +936%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −610%	70−75 +610%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −767%	75−80 +767%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −633%	85−90 +633%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −546%	180−190 +546%
Hitman 3	10−11 −640%	70−75 +640%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1060%	110−120 +1060%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −608%	85−90 +608%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −641%	120−130 +641%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −177%	120−130 +177%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −936%	110−120 +936%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −610%	70−75 +610%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −767%	75−80 +767%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −633%	85−90 +633%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −546%	180−190 +546%
Hitman 3	10−11 −640%	70−75 +640%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1060%	110−120 +1060%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −608%	85−90 +608%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −641%	120−130 +641%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −329%	70−75 +329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −177%	120−130 +177%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −610%	70−75 +610%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −767%	75−80 +767%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −546%	180−190 +546%
Hitman 3	10−11 −640%	70−75 +640%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −641%	120−130 +641%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −329%	70−75 +329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −177%	120−130 +177%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−608%

85−90
+608%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −738%	65−70 +738%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −671%	50−55 +671%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −850%	35−40 +850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −925%	40−45 +925%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2400%	200−210 +2400%
Hitman 3	9−10 −389%	40−45 +389%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −650%	75−80 +650%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6500%	65−70 +6500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1125%	45−50 +1125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −539%	170−180 +539%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−650%

60−65
+650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −867%	27−30 +867%
Hitman 3	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −5533%	160−170 +5533%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	40−45

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1500%	45−50 +1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−520%

30−35
+520%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 6500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro W6600M is ahead in 62 tests (87%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.49	24.68
Recency	30 March 2021	8 June 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	90 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 500% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 449.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.