RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs UHD Graphics 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.49

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 712% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking624120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.10no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$1454 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563072
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate20.80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 750 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16000 MHz
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Hitman 3 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Hitman 3 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Hitman 3 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 36.48
Recency 30 March 2021 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 355 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.