Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs UHD Graphics 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.49

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.81no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−170%
27
+170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−40.9%
60−65
+40.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−129%
39
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−40.9%
60−65
+40.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−76.5%
30
+76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−40.9%
60−65
+40.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%
Hitman 3 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 7−8

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 170% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 6% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 61 test (94%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 10.58
Recency 30 March 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 135.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.