Radeon 760M vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
14.23

Radeon 760M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking340321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRDNA 3
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data67.20

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 14.23
Radeon 760M 15.29
+7.4%

Radeon 760M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768
Radeon 760M 32985
+1766%

Radeon 760M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 1766% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+19.6%
Radeon 760M 9603

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Radeon 760M by 20% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613
Radeon 760M 6142
+281%

Radeon 760M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 281% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+99.4%
Radeon 760M 41767

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Radeon 760M by 99% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−138%
31
+138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−36.4%
30
+36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−6.1%
50−55
+6.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−9.1%
24
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 9
−322%
38
+322%
Far Cry New Dawn 10
−320%
40−45
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−6.1%
50−55
+6.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 8
−338%
35
+338%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−367%
40−45
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%
Hitman 3 35−40
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 7
−243%
24−27
+243%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−20%
36
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−6.1%
50−55
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 8
−313%
33
+313%
Far Cry New Dawn 8
−425%
40−45
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+30.4%
23
−30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−10.3%
30−35
+10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−8.7%
24−27
+8.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Hitman 3 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 138% faster than UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 30.4% faster than the Radeon 760M.
  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 425% faster than the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 63 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 14.23 15.29
Recency 30 March 2021 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 54 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon 760M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 77 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.