GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB, including specs and performance data.
RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 432 | 148 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 63.80 | 16.44 |
| Architecture | no data | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GA106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 12 October 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1320 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1777 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 12,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 199.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 48 |
| TMUs | no data | 112 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 112 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 28 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 242 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 12-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1875 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 240.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12
−192%
| 35−40
+192%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
−186%
|
200−210
+186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−188%
|
75−80
+188%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−191%
|
160−170
+191%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
−186%
|
200−210
+186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−188%
|
75−80
+188%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
−188%
|
150−160
+188%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
−188%
|
210−220
+188%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−178%
|
150−160
+178%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
−182%
|
110−120
+182%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−183%
|
130−140
+183%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
−170%
|
300−310
+170%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−191%
|
160−170
+191%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
−186%
|
200−210
+186%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
−181%
|
500−550
+181%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−188%
|
75−80
+188%
|
| Dota 2 | 27
−178%
|
75−80
+178%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
−188%
|
150−160
+188%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
−188%
|
210−220
+188%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−178%
|
150−160
+178%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40
−182%
|
110−120
+182%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−183%
|
130−140
+183%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−188%
|
95−100
+188%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
−170%
|
300−310
+170%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−191%
|
160−170
+191%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−188%
|
75−80
+188%
|
| Dota 2 | 25
−180%
|
70−75
+180%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
−188%
|
150−160
+188%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−178%
|
150−160
+178%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−183%
|
130−140
+183%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−188%
|
95−100
+188%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
−170%
|
300−310
+170%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75
−188%
|
210−220
+188%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−192%
|
70−75
+192%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
−184%
|
270−280
+184%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
−189%
|
55−60
+189%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−167%
|
40−45
+167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
−190%
|
290−300
+190%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−161%
|
350−400
+161%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−186%
|
100−105
+186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
−180%
|
70−75
+180%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
−178%
|
75−80
+178%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−190%
|
90−95
+190%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−178%
|
50−55
+178%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
−186%
|
80−85
+186%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
−192%
|
70−75
+192%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−165%
|
45−50
+165%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−179%
|
190−200
+179%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−178%
|
50−55
+178%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−163%
|
21−24
+163%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
−183%
|
130−140
+183%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−169%
|
35−40
+169%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−173%
|
60−65
+173%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and RTX 3060 8 GB compete in popular games:
- RTX 3060 8 GB is 192% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.46 | 36.38 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 12 October 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 1033.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 3060 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 192% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
