GeForce Go 6150 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce Go 6150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 24960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 436 | 1549 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 64.32 | no data |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 3 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | shared Memory |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 24−27 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+363%
|
24−27
−363%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+1878%
|
9−10
−1878%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 27
+286%
|
7−8
−286%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+725%
|
4−5
−725%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+363%
|
24−27
−363%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 25
+257%
|
7−8
−257%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+725%
|
4−5
−725%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+363%
|
24−27
−363%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+10400%
|
1−2
−10400%
|
| Valorant | 130−140 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 65−70 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 10400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed Go 6150 in all 21 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.53 | 0.05 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 110 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 24960% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
