GeForce 9800 GT vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with GeForce 9800 GT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
14.07
+1035%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 1035% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3701042
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
Power efficiency64.720.68
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1G92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)21 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data112
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data33.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.336 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data1-slot
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data160.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Elden Ring 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Metro Exodus 10 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Valorant 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Dota 2 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Elden Ring 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Far Cry 5 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Fortnite 75−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 6 0−1
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1175%
8−9
−1175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Valorant 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
World of Tanks 180−190
+1063%
16−18
−1063%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Dota 2 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1175%
8−9
−1175%
Valorant 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Elden Ring 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+1070%
10−11
−1070%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
World of Tanks 95−100
+1138%
8−9
−1138%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Valorant 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Elden Ring 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Fortnite 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Valorant 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and 9800 GT compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 1100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.07 1.24
Recency 30 March 2021 21 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 1034.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 114 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1459 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.