T1000 vs UHD Graphics 630

Place in performance ranking	724	264
Place by popularity	32	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.36	39.15
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 (2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2017 (6 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$457	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T1000 has 10775% better value for money than UHD Graphics 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	896
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.45	78.12
Floating-point performance	460.8 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.08

T1000 19.83
+544%

T1000 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 544% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 630 1192

T1000 7672
+544%

T1000 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 544% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 −532%	120−130 +532%
1440p	10 −500%	60−65 +500%
4K	7 −543%	45−50 +543%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5
−500%

30−33

+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 −543%	45−50 +543%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	10 −500%	60−65 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Far Cry 5	7 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry New Dawn	9 −511%	55−60 +511%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Hitman 3	8 −525%	50−55 +525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12 −525%	75−80 +525%
Metro Exodus	13 −515%	80−85 +515%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 −511%	55−60 +511%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 −515%	80−85 +515%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Far Cry 5	13 −515%	80−85 +515%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Hitman 3	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 −543%	45−50 +543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6 −483%	35−40 +483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−543%

45−50

+543%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	7 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−500%

24−27

+500%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and T1000 compete in popular games:

T1000 is 532% faster in 1080p
T1000 is 500% faster in 1440p
T1000 is 543% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.08	19.83
Recency	1 October 2017	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt