GeForce GT 220 vs UHD Graphics 630

Place in performance ranking	720	1172
Place by popularity	32	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.37	no data
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 (2017)	GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	GT216
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2017 (6 years ago)	12 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$79.99
Current price	$457	$121 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 630 and GT 220 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	300 MHz	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	26.45	9.840
Floating-point performance	460.8 gflops	144 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	6.6" (16.8 cm)
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	IGP	1-slot

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	790 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	VGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF + HDA

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.5	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.1
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.103	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.08
+460%

GT 220 0.55

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GT 220 by 460% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 630 1192
+457%

GT 220 214

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GT 220 by 457% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
1440p	10 +900%	1−2 −900%
4K	7 +600%	1−2 −600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5
+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Hitman 3	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6 +0%	6−7 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6	0−1
Metro Exodus	3 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and GT 220 compete in popular games:

GT 220 is 23.5% faster than UHD Graphics 630 in 1080p
UHD Graphics 630 is 900% faster than GT 220 in 1440p
UHD Graphics 630 is 600% faster than GT 220 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 630 is 400% faster than the GT 220.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 630 is ahead in 22 tests (88%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (12%)

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	3.08	0.55
Recency	1 October 2017	12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	58 Watt