GeForce4 4200 Go vs UHD Graphics 620
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 805 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 24 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 12.32 | no data |
Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | no data |
GPU code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | NV28M |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 (7 years ago) | 15 November 2002 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 6 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 2 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 200 MHz |
Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm++ | 150 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.384 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 3 | no data |
TMUs | 24 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | Ring Bus | no data |
Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 200 MHz |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DDR |
Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 September 2017 | 15 November 2002 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 150 nm |
UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce4 4200 Go. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a desktop card while GeForce4 4200 Go is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.