GeForce FX 5700 vs HD Graphics 610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 610 with GeForce FX 5700, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 610
2016
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 5 Watt
1.85
+1750%

HD Graphics 610 outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 1750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9231457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.440.27
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT1NV36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)23 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed300 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate10.801.700
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount32 GB128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 610 1.85
+1750%
FX 5700 0.10

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 610 712
+1680%
FX 5700 40

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Atomic Heart 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 3 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Atomic Heart 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 12 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 11 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.85 0.10
Recency 30 August 2016 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 25 Watt

HD Graphics 610 has a 1750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 610 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 610 is a notebook card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
555 votes

Rate HD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8
72 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 610 or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.