Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Comparison of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
1 September 2017
12 March 2015
UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
UHD Graphics 620 9307 +12%
GeForce 930M 8309
3DMark Fire Strike Score
UHD Graphics 620 1071
GeForce 930M 1291 +20.5%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
UHD Graphics 620 1163
GeForce 930M 1461 +25.6%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
UHD Graphics 620 1747
GeForce 930M 2153 +23.2%
3DMark Vantage Performance
UHD Graphics 620 7761 +6.7%
GeForce 930M 7274
UHD Graphics 620 1030 +1.3%
GeForce 930M 1017
Cryptocurrency mining performance of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620
Much newer (1 September 2017 vs 12 March 2015)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 33 watts)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 930M
More pipelines (384 vs 24)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
So, UHD Graphics 620 or 930M?
Technical City couldn't decide between Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 930M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 930M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.