GeForce GT 555M vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

UHD Graphics 620
2017
32768 Mb LPDDR3/DDR4
2.66
+56.5%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 555M by an impressive 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking774890
Place by popularity18not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.740.10
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-Refresh GT2N12E-GE-B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2017 (6 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$706 $310

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 620 has 640% better value for money than GT 555M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24144
CUDA coresno dataUp to 144
Core clock speed300 MHzUp to 753 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz753 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate27.60Up to 16.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data388.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce GT 555M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR3\DDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedUp to 192 bit/128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem SharedUp to 1569 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 50.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
3D Gamingno data+
Optimusno data+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 620 2.66
+56.5%
GT 555M 1.70

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 555M by 56% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 620 1030
+56.8%
GT 555M 657

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 555M by 57% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 7330
+24.6%
GT 555M 5884

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 555M by 25% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 1744
+52.2%
GT 555M 1146

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 555M by 52% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
Full HD13
−92.3%
25
+92.3%
1440p16
+60%
10−12
−60%
4K8
+60%
5−6
−60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+700%
1−2
−700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how UHD Graphics 620 and GT 555M compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 42% faster in 900p
  • GT 555M is 92% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 620 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics 620 is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 700% faster than the GT 555M.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 555M is 67% faster than the UHD Graphics 620.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is ahead in 36 tests (88%)
  • GT 555M is ahead in 2 tests (5%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 1.70
Recency 1 September 2017 6 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The UHD Graphics 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 555M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GeForce GT 555M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3820 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 161 vote

Rate GeForce GT 555M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.