GeForce RTX 5080 vs UHD Graphics 605

Place in the ranking	1076	3
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	42.05
Power efficiency	16.22	18.63
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	Gemini Lake GT1.5	GB203
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)	30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	144	10752
Core clock speed	200 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	750 MHz	2617 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	360 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.50	879.3
Floating-point processing power	0.216 TFLOPS	56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	128
TMUs	18	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	-	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 605 1.10

RTX 5080 91.00
+8173%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 605 453

RTX 5080 37502
+8179%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	11 −1655%	193 +1655%
1440p	24 −542%	154 +542%
4K	15 −580%	102 +580%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.18
1440p	no data	6.49
4K	no data	9.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2500%	150−160 +2500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2900%	210−220 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Dota 2	2 −8650%	170−180 +8650%
Far Cry 5	5 −3040%	157 +3040%
Fortnite	4−5 −7600%	300−350 +7600%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −7900%	80−85 +7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5 −4200%	210−220 +4200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2500%	150−160 +2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −2386%	170−180 +2386%
World of Tanks	24−27 −973%	270−280 +973%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −3071%	222 +3071%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Dota 2	7 −7757%	550−600 +7757%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1582%	180−190 +1582%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −8025%	650−700 +8025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1554%	210−220 +1554%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −7400%	450−500 +7400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	90−95
World of Tanks	6−7 −8500%	500−550 +8500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7900%	240−250 +7900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Valorant	6−7 −9033%	500−550 +9033%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	109
Dota 2	14−16 −1147%	180−190 +1147%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −7900%	1200−1250 +7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −6867%	200−210 +6867%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	60−65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −7900%	1200−1250 +7900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	36
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7900%	160−170 +7900%
Dota 2	14−16 −7900%	1200−1250 +7900%
Far Cry 5	0−1	100−110
Valorant	1−2 −32600%	300−350 +32600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	280−290 +0%	280−290 +0%
Metro Exodus	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Valorant	700−750 +0%	700−750 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	280−290 +0%	280−290 +0%
Metro Exodus	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Valorant	700−750 +0%	700−750 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	280−290 +0%	280−290 +0%
Valorant	700−750 +0%	700−750 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2

160−170

+0%

160−170

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

130−140

+0%

130−140

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics 605 and RTX 5080 compete in popular games:

RTX 5080 is 1655% faster in 1080p
RTX 5080 is 542% faster in 1440p
RTX 5080 is 580% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5080 is 32600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 5080 is ahead in 24 tests (63%)
there's a draw in 14 tests (37%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.10	91.00
Recency	11 December 2017	30 January 2025
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	360 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 7100% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 8172.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.