GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

UHD Graphics 600
2017
DDR4 / LPDDR4
0.86

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 2059% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1091282
Place by popularity2846
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
ArchitectureGen. 9 Gemini Lake (2017)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGemini LakeGN20-S7
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$274 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores122048
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed700 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000189.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 600 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4 / LPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.86
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.57
+2059%

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by 2059% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 600 2189
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+2039%

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by 2039% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 600 578
RTX 2050 Mobile 12195
+2010%

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by 2010% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 600 433
RTX 2050 Mobile 8815
+1936%

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by 1936% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 600 3436
RTX 2050 Mobile 58068
+1590%

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by 1590% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−320%
42
+320%
1440p1
−3000%
31
+3000%
4K1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−433%
45−50
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Hitman 3 0−1 68
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−433%
45−50
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Hitman 3 0−1 56
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1833%
58
+1833%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1033%
34
+1033%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Hitman 3 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3600%
37
+3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 320% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 3000% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 2700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 3600% faster than the UHD Graphics 600.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2050 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics 600 in all 25 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 18.57
Recency 11 December 2017 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3083 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1488 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.