GeForce GT 520M vs UHD Graphics 600

Place in the ranking	1134	1164
Place by popularity	59	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	12.00	4.25
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Gemini Lake GT1	GF108
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)	5 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$59.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	48
Core clock speed	200 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	4.800
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	4
TMUs	12	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 API
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87
+17.6%

GT 520M 0.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334
+17.2%

GT 520M 285

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 600 578
+15.1%

GT 520M 502

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 600 2189

GT 520M 2280
+4.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	9−10 +12.5%	8 −12.5%
Full HD	10 −20%	12 +20%
1200p	8−9 +14.3%	7 −14.3%
1440p	1	0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Dota 2	2 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	4 −100%	8−9 +100%
Fortnite	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
World of Tanks	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Dota 2	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	4 −75%	7−8 +75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
World of Tanks	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and GT 520M compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 600 is 13% faster in 900p
GT 520M is 20% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 600 is 14% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics 600 is 33% faster.
in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 520M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 600 is ahead in 15 tests (43%)
GT 520M is ahead in 4 tests (11%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.87	0.74
Recency	11 December 2017	5 January 2011
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	12 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.