Radeon Instinct MI50 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking843not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)18 November 2018 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores243840
Core clock speed450 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1746 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data419.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.41 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.02 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 18 November 2018
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has an age advantage of 4 years.

Instinct MI50, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon Instinct MI50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI50 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
Radeon Instinct MI50

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 72 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.