Radeon 620 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Aggregated performance score
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms Radeon 620 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 807 | 810 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | no data | 0.34 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Alder Lake Xe | Polaris 24 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 12 August 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $67 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 24.58 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported GPU Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms Radeon 620 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Radeon 620 outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by 46% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8
+14.3%
| 7−8
−14.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is 14.3% faster than Radeon 620 in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is 250% faster than the Radeon 620.
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 620 is 167% faster than the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N).
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is ahead in 8 tests (18%)
- Radeon 620 is ahead in 3 tests (7%)
- there's a draw in 33 tests (75%)
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 2.34 | 2.32 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 12 August 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon 620.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
