Radeon X1800 GTO vs Titan X Pascal

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	147	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	15.06	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code name	GP102	R520
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2016 (7 years ago)	1 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$312 (0.3x MSRP)	$220

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	no data
Core clock speed	1418 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	11,800 million	321 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	6.000
Floating-point performance	10,974 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	990 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	31.68 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.4	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	25 July 2016	1 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	48 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---