GeForce 610M vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with GeForce 610M, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
29.15
+4385%

Titan X Pascal outperforms 610M by a whopping 4385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1711174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.00no data
Power efficiency9.234.29
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP102GF119
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358448
Core clock speed1417 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate342.95.904
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS0.1417 TFLOPS
Video decodersno dataH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p
ROPs964
TMUs2248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/sUp to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 29.15
+4385%
GeForce 610M 0.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+4361%
GeForce 610M 292

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+6990%
GeForce 610M 508

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+4468%
GeForce 610M 2210

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+6100%
2−3
−6100%
1440p74
+7300%
1−2
−7300%
4K58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67no data
1440p16.20no data
4K20.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 337
+4714%
7−8
−4714%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+4050%
2−3
−4050%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+2875%
4−5
−2875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 153
+5000%
3−4
−5000%
Counter-Strike 2 291
+4750%
6−7
−4750%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Far Cry 5 162
+5300%
3−4
−5300%
Fortnite 210
+5150%
4−5
−5150%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+2440%
5−6
−2440%
Forza Horizon 5 119
+5850%
2−3
−5850%
Hogwarts Legacy 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+1313%
8−9
−1313%
Valorant 296
+921%
27−30
−921%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 147
+4800%
3−4
−4800%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+5025%
4−5
−5025%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1275%
20−22
−1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Dota 2 252
+1838%
12−14
−1838%
Far Cry 5 149
+4867%
3−4
−4867%
Fortnite 199
+4875%
4−5
−4875%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+2320%
5−6
−2320%
Forza Horizon 5 106
+5200%
2−3
−5200%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+5233%
3−4
−5233%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+1700%
4−5
−1700%
Metro Exodus 96
+9500%
1−2
−9500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+1313%
8−9
−1313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+2967%
6−7
−2967%
Valorant 275
+848%
27−30
−848%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 137
+4467%
3−4
−4467%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Dota 2 232
+1685%
12−14
−1685%
Far Cry 5 140
+4567%
3−4
−4567%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+2140%
5−6
−2140%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+1175%
8−9
−1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+1483%
6−7
−1483%
Valorant 181
+524%
27−30
−524%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170
+5567%
3−4
−5567%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
+5450%
2−3
−5450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+7167%
3−4
−7167%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+5050%
2−3
−5050%
Metro Exodus 58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2400%
7−8
−2400%
Valorant 258
+5060%
5−6
−5060%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+8300%
1−2
−8300%
Cyberpunk 2077 37 0−1
Far Cry 5 101
+2425%
4−5
−2425%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+4200%
2−3
−4200%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+7900%
1−2
−7900%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+560%
14−16
−560%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 36 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Valorant 257
+6325%
4−5
−6325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 17 0−1
Dota 2 160
+5233%
3−4
−5233%
Far Cry 5 53
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Hogwarts Legacy 22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

This is how Titan X Pascal and GeForce 610M compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 6100% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 7300% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 5700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 9500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Titan X Pascal surpassed GeForce 610M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.15 0.65
Recency 2 August 2016 1 December 2011
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 12 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 4384.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 610M, on the other hand, has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while GeForce 610M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 766 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or GeForce 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.