Arc Pro A50 vs Titan X Pascal
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 198 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.07 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.59 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | GP102 | DG2-128 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 8 August 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 2350 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 | 150.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 10.97 TFLOPS | 4.813 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 32 |
| TMUs | 224 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1251 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 August 2016 | 8 August 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Titan X Pascal has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 167% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A50 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
