RTX A4500 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.84

RTX A4500 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking42036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.15
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Current priceno data$2591

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores967168
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data369.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RTX A4500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data20 GB
Memory bus widthno data320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−445%
180−190
+445%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−471%
200−210
+471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−445%
180−190
+445%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−471%
200−210
+471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−445%
180−190
+445%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−471%
200−210
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.84 56.31
Recency 15 August 2020 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 178 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.