GeForce MX570 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.28

MX570 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking456358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.98
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962048
Core clock speedno data832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.92
Floating-point processing powerno data4.731 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−58.3%
38
+58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−50%
45−50
+50%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Fortnite 55−60
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%
Valorant 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−50%
45−50
+50%
Dota 2 35−40
+200%
12
−200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−70%
68
+70%
Fortnite 55−60
−43.1%
80−85
+43.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−47.2%
50−55
+47.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−51.9%
40−45
+51.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−39%
100−110
+39%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Valorant 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
World of Tanks 140−150
−35%
190−200
+35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−50%
45−50
+50%
Dota 2 35−40
−50%
50−55
+50%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−35%
50−55
+35%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−39%
100−110
+39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−69.2%
21−24
+69.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Valorant 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−63.6%
35−40
+63.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−68.2%
35−40
+68.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Valorant 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Dota 2 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 58% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 200% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 33 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.28 13.90
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

GeForce MX570 has a 49.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-4
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
RTX 8200 Quadro RTX 8200
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX 750 GM206 GeForce GTX 750 GM206
vs
UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1
Playstation 3 RSX 28nm Playstation 3 RSX 28nm
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G4
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
Graphics 384SP Radeon Graphics 384SP
vs
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
Graphics 384SP Radeon Graphics 384SP
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
HD 8400 Mobile IGP Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
RX 7950 XTX Radeon RX 7950 XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.