Radeon R9 285X vs Tesla V100 PCIe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGV100Tonga
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date21 June 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202048
Core clock speed1246 MHz1002 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate441.6128.3
Floating-point processing powerno data4.104 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs320128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB3 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1758 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth900.1 GB/s264.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan-1.2.170
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Tesla V100 PCIe has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

R9 285X, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 PCIe and Radeon R9 285X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 PCIe is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 285X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Tesla V100 PCIe
AMD Radeon R9 285X
Radeon R9 285X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 114 votes

Rate Tesla V100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.