Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs Radeon R9 285X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTongaGV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20485120
Core clock speed1002 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate128.3489.6
Floating-point processing power4.104 TFLOPS15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs128320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz876 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s897.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

R9 285X has 25% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB, on the other hand, has a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285X and Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 285X is a desktop card while Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 285X
Radeon R9 285X
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.