GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER vs Tesla M40 24 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.53no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM200GA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307210752
Core clock speed948 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1112 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate213.5569.5
Floating-point processing power6.832 TFLOPS36.45 TFLOPS
ROPs96112
TMUs192336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm336 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount24 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz21.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s1,018 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA5.28.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 400 Watt

Tesla M40 24 GB has 60% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M40 24 GB and GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M40 24 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
Tesla M40 24 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER
GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Tesla M40 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 424 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.