Quadro P620 vs Tesla M2090
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla M2090 and Quadro P620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 468 | 470 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 2.63 | 16.37 |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | GF110 | GP107 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 1177 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1443 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 40 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 46.18 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.332 TFLOPS | 1.478 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 48 | 16 |
TMUs | 64 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | 145 mm |
Width | 2-slot | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 924 MHz | 1502 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 96.13 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.0 | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 45−50
−6.7%
| 48
+6.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 64
+0%
|
64
+0%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 125
+0%
|
125
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 83
+0%
|
83
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Valorant | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
This is how Tesla M2090 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:
- Quadro P620 is 7% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.17 | 9.15 |
Recency | 25 July 2011 | 1 February 2018 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 40 Watt |
Tesla M2090 has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Quadro P620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla M2090 and Quadro P620.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.