Tesla M2090 vs Quadro P600

Place in the ranking	558	530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.63	no data
Power efficiency	15.21	2.69
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP107	GF110
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 February 2017 (8 years ago)	25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$178	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	512
Core clock speed	1430 MHz	651 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.88	41.66
Floating-point processing power	1.244 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	24	64
L1 Cache	144 KB	1 MB
L2 Cache	1024 KB	768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	248 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1252 MHz	924 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	177.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

36
+2.9%

35−40

−2.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.94

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Fortnite	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Valorant	80−85 −9.8%	90−95 +9.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120−130 −3.2%	130−140 +3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	81 −4.9%	85−90 +4.9%
Escape from Tarkov	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Fortnite	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −8%	27−30 +8%
Valorant	80−85 −9.8%	90−95 +9.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	72 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
Escape from Tarkov	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	80−85 −9.8%	90−95 +9.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

45−50

−2%

50−55
+2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Valorant	90−95 −5.6%	95−100 +5.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

16−18

−5.9%

18−20
+5.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	40−45 −9.8%	45−50 +9.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Escape from Tarkov	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

8−9

+0%

8−9
+0%

This is how Quadro P600 and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

Quadro P600 is 3% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.89	8.73
Recency	7 February 2017	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt