HD Graphics 4400 vs Tesla M2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2070 with HD Graphics 4400, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2070
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
4.87
+261%

Tesla M2070 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by a whopping 261% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking603976
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.060.04
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGF100Haswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (12 years ago)5 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,099 no data
Current price$4064 (1.3x MSRP)$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M2070 has 50% better value for money than HD Graphics 4400.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44820
Core clock speed574 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1422.00
Floating-point performance1,030.4 gflops46 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M2070 and HD Graphics 4400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed3132 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA2.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+233%
12
−233%
Full HD35−40
+218%
11
−218%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hitman 3 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hitman 3 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

This is how Tesla M2070 and HD Graphics 4400 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M2070 is 233% faster in 900p
  • Tesla M2070 is 218% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.87 1.35
Recency 25 July 2011 5 June 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 20 Watt

The Tesla M2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2070 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Tesla M2070
Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Tesla M2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1274 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.