GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Tesla M2070-Q

Place in the ranking	739	215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	no data
Power efficiency	1.04	24.18
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF100	GA106
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,489	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	2560
Core clock speed	574 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1035 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	82.80
Floating-point processing power	1.028 TFLOPS	5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	56	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	783 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	2.0	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M2070-Q 3.35

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.01
+676%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla M2070-Q 1305

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10126
+676%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9−10 −722%	74 +722%
1440p	5−6 −740%	42 +740%
4K	3−4 −833%	28 +833%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	609.89	no data
1440p	1097.80	no data
4K	1829.67	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +0%	62 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +0%	50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	128 +0%	128 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	87 +0%	87 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 +0%	98 +0%
Valorant	121 +0%	121 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Far Cry 5	75 +0%	75 +0%
Fortnite	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	105 +0%	105 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	94 +0%	94 +0%
Metro Exodus	62 +0%	62 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +0%	39 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	79 +0%	79 +0%
World of Tanks	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35 +0%	35 +0%
Dota 2	113 +0%	113 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90 +0%	90 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	112 +0%	112 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	41 +0%	41 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +0%	41 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
World of Tanks	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 +0%	21 +0%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +0%	61 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	81 +0%	81 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Dota 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	44 +0%	44 +0%
Metro Exodus	21 +0%	21 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +0%	44 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Dota 2	54 +0%	54 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Fortnite	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +0%	34 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

This is how Tesla M2070-Q and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 722% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 740% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 833% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.35	26.01
Recency	25 July 2011	11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt

Tesla M2070-Q has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 676.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2070-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2070-Q is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.