GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 A Mobile 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 6000 with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 6000
2010, $4,399
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
6.43

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms 6000 by a whopping 275% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking615263
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency2.4224.68
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF100GA106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 December 2010 (15 years ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speed574 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1482.80
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs5680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache896 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache768 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 6000 6.43
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 24.10
+275%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 6000 2691
Samples: 260
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10080
+275%
Samples: 8771

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−317%
75
+317%
1440p10−12
−320%
42
+320%
4K7−8
−286%
27
+286%

Cost per frame, $

1080p244.39no data
1440p439.90no data
4K628.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Quadro 6000 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 317% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 320% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 286% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.43 24.10
Recency 10 December 2010 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro 6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 274.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 172% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
FirePro R5000 FirePro R5000
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GTX 560 OEM GTX 560 OEM
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GTX 950A GTX 950A
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
FX 1800 FX 1800
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Go 7300 Go 7300
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FX 5200 LE FX 5200 LE
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
NVS 5100M NVS 5100M
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 41 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4685 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 6000 or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.