Quadro P620 vs Tesla K80

Place in performance ranking	329	438
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.53	21.31
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK210	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	17 November 2014 (9 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$83	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 70% better value for money than Tesla K80.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2496	512
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	824 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	7,100 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.4	43.33
Floating-point performance	no data	1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	240.6 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.7	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K80 15.15
+61%

Quadro P620 9.41

Tesla K80 outperforms Quadro P620 by 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla K80 5852
+61.1%

Quadro P620 3633

Tesla K80 outperforms Quadro P620 by 61% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Tesla K80 16063
+37%

Quadro P620 11727

Tesla K80 outperforms Quadro P620 by 37% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

85−90
+54.5%

−54.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+60%

14−16

−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +59.1%	21−24 −59.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Hitman 3	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +57.1%	35 −57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +47.1%	30−35 −47.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +59.1%	21−24 −59.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Hitman 3	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +56.3%	32 −56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +47.1%	30−35 −47.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +59.1%	21−24 −59.1%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +58.8%	17 −58.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +47.1%	30−35 −47.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+53.8%

24−27

−53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +58.8%	16−18 −58.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+50%

16−18

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Hitman 3	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

+55.6%

9−10
−55.6%

This is how Tesla K80 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Tesla K80 is 55% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.15	9.41
Recency	17 November 2014	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	25 Watt