Quadro P620 vs Tesla K20m

Place in performance ranking	385	439
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	21.31
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK110	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	5 January 2013 (11 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,199	no data
Current price	$5781 (1.8x MSRP)	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 8096% better value for money than Tesla K20m.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2496	512
Core clock speed	706 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	146.8	43.33
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops	1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	208.0 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.5	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K20m 11.48
+22%

Quadro P620 9.41

Tesla K20m outperforms Quadro P620 by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla K20m 4432
+22%

Quadro P620 3633

Tesla K20m outperforms Quadro P620 by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

65−70
+18.2%

−18.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+20%

14−16

−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +19.6%	45−50 −19.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +14.3%	35 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.6%	30−35 −17.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +19.6%	45−50 −19.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +7.7%	13 −7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +15.4%	24−27 −15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +9.4%	32 −9.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.6%	30−35 −17.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +19.6%	45−50 −19.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +5.9%	17 −5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +17.6%	30−35 −17.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+15.4%

24−27

−15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Hitman 3	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+12.5%

16−18

−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+11.1%

9−10
−11.1%

This is how Tesla K20m and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Tesla K20m is 18% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.48	9.41
Recency	5 January 2013	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	25 Watt