Tesla K80 vs Quadro P5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with Tesla K80, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.66
+106%

P5200 outperforms Tesla K80 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking185358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.533.48
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGP104GK210
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602496 ×2
Core clock speed1556 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate279.4171.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS4.113 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6448 ×2
TMUs160208 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s240.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.13.7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5200 30.66
+106%
Tesla K80 14.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12063
+106%
Tesla K80 5852

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P5200 45689
+184%
Tesla K80 16063

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+118%
55−60
−118%
4K48
+129%
21−24
−129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+110%
40−45
−110%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+110%
40−45
−110%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Fortnite 130−140
+109%
65−70
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
Valorant 180−190
+108%
90−95
−108%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+110%
40−45
−110%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+110%
130−140
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Dota 2 130−140
+122%
60−65
−122%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Fortnite 130−140
+109%
65−70
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+108%
50−55
−108%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+115%
55−60
−115%
Valorant 180−190
+108%
90−95
−108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+126%
27−30
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Dota 2 130−140
+122%
60−65
−122%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+113%
45−50
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+113%
55−60
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+117%
30−33
−117%
Valorant 180−190
+108%
90−95
−108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+109%
65−70
−109%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+114%
95−100
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%
Valorant 220−230
+125%
100−105
−125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+126%
35−40
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+130%
30−33
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+119%
21−24
−119%
Valorant 170−180
+119%
80−85
−119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 90−95
+128%
40−45
−128%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%

This is how Quadro P5200 and Tesla K80 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 118% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5200 is 129% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.66 14.87
Recency 21 February 2018 17 November 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 106.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while Tesla K80 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 100 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 185 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or Tesla K80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.