GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 vs Tesla M2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF100G96B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44832
Core clock speed575 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.209.600
Floating-point processing power1.03 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs5616
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm175 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.01.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

Tesla M2050 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GT Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2050 and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Tesla M2050
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2050 or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.