Quadro K4000 vs Tesla K20c

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Tesla K20c
2012
5 GB GDDR5
8.90
+26.6%

Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K4000 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking454518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.441.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110GK106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (11 years ago)1 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 $1,269
Current price$591 (0.2x MSRP)$330 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K4000 has 10% better value for money than Tesla K20c.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496768
Core clock speed706 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate146.851.84
Floating-point performance3,524 gflops1,244 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB3 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5200 MHz5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/s134.8 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.53.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K20c 8.90
+26.6%
Quadro K4000 7.03

Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K4000 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Tesla K20c 60
+173%
Quadro K4000 22

Tesla K20c outperforms Quadro K4000 by 173% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 8.90 7.03
Recency 12 November 2012 1 March 2013
Cost $3199 $1269
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 3 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt

The Tesla K20c is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 179 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.