UHD Graphics vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2200 with UHD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
8.55
+66.7%

K2200 outperforms UHD Graphics by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking521652
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.37no data
Power efficiency9.5839.08
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Comet Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)21 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed1046 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9628.80
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.1.103
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K2200 8.55
+66.7%
UHD Graphics 5.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K2200 Samples: 2478 3581
+66.5%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.55 5.13
Recency 22 July 2014 21 August 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro K2200 has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 353.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 456 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8847 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.