Tesla M40 vs Tesla C2075

Place in performance ranking	457	189
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.36	76.69
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code name	GF110	GM200
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	10 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$2237	$101

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M40 has 21203% better value for money than Tesla C2075.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	3072
Core clock speed	574 MHz	948 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1112 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	213.5
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	6,844 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	248 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	8-pin EPS

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.0	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla C2075 8.69

Tesla M40 26.31
+203%

Tesla M40 outperforms Tesla C2075 by 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla C2075 3364

Tesla M40 10182
+203%

Tesla M40 outperforms Tesla C2075 by 203% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	8.69	26.31
Recency	25 July 2011	10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	250 Watt