Quadro FX 5500 SDI vs TITAN Xp

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.08no data
Power efficiency14.00no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGP102G71
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $6,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1405 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt104 Watt
Texture fill rate379.715.60
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs9616
TMUs24024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz505 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s32.32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 April 2017 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 104 Watt

TITAN Xp has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5500 SDI, on the other hand, has 140.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN Xp and Quadro FX 5500 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while Quadro FX 5500 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 SDI
Quadro FX 5500 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4666 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 5500 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.