Radeon RX Vega 64 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano Radeon RX Vega XL Radeon RX Vega XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Radeon RX Vega 64, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
43.52
+20.6%

TITAN V outperforms RX Vega 64 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.44
Power efficiency12.228.59
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

TITAN V and RX Vega 64 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1200 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6395.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS12.66 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 43.52
+20.6%
RX Vega 64 36.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+20.6%
RX Vega 64 14198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+17.6%
119
−17.6%
1440p152
+85.4%
82
−85.4%
4K82
+51.9%
54
−51.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.42
−411%
4.19
+411%
1440p19.73
−224%
6.09
+224%
4K36.57
−296%
9.24
+296%
  • RX Vega 64 has 411% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 224% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 296% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 315
+0%
315
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 150
+0%
150
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+0%
132
+0%
Valorant 293
+0%
293
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX Vega 64 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 18% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 85% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 52% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 43.52 36.08
Recency 7 December 2017 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 295 Watt

TITAN V has a 20.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 18% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB NVIDIA P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
TITAN V V
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
TITAN V V
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
TITAN V V
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
TITAN V V
Tesla V100 PCIe NVIDIA V100 PCIe
vs
TITAN V V
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling AMD RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
vs
TITAN V V
GTX 1070 SLI NVIDIA GTX 1070 SLI
vs
TITAN V V
Pro SSG AMD Pro SSG
vs
TITAN V V
GTX 1070 Ti NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti
vs
TITAN V V
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
TITAN V V

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3298 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 740 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or Radeon RX Vega 64, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.