Radeon RX Vega 64 vs TITAN V

Place in performance ranking	71	119
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	40.38	55.61
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	GV100	Vega
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	14 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$499
Current price	$228 (0.1x MSRP)	$125 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 64 has 38% better value for money than TITAN V.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	4096
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1630 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1546 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	295 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	395.8
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	13,353 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	279 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	945 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	483.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.1.125
CUDA	7.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.22
+19%

RX Vega 64 37.17

TITAN V outperforms Radeon RX Vega 64 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V 17125
+19%

RX Vega 64 14393

TITAN V outperforms Radeon RX Vega 64 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130−140 +11.1%	117 −11.1%
1440p	152 +100%	76 −100%
4K	82 +64%	50 −64%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	44.22	37.17
Recency	7 December 2017	14 August 2017
Cost	$2999	$499
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	295 Watt