Radeon RX Vega 64 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Radeon RX Vega 64, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.38
+19.8%

TITAN V outperforms RX Vega 64 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.13
Power efficiency12.298.70
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and RX Vega 64 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1200 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6395.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS12.66 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.38
+19.8%
RX Vega 64 37.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+19.8%
RX Vega 64 14299

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+13%
115
−13%
1440p152
+100%
76
−100%
4K82
+57.7%
52
−57.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p23.074.34
1440p19.736.57
4K36.579.60

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
+0%
81
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
+0%
83
+0%
Battlefield 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+0%
68
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 321
+0%
321
+0%
Hitman 3 84
+0%
84
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 315
+0%
315
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 178
+0%
178
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 261
+0%
261
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 158
+0%
158
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+0%
69
+0%
Battlefield 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65
+0%
65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+0%
294
+0%
Hitman 3 81
+0%
81
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
+0%
293
+0%
Metro Exodus 132
+0%
132
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 164
+0%
164
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 247
+0%
247
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+0%
51
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 54
+0%
54
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
Hitman 3 73
+0%
73
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+0%
100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 143
+0%
143
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+0%
54
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 89
+0%
89
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+0%
47
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 50
+0%
50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+0%
80
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+0%
100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 243
+0%
243
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+0%
36
+0%
Hitman 3 38
+0%
38
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+0%
29
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+0%
28
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+0%
66
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59
+0%
59
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+0%
31
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX Vega 64 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 13% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 100% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 58% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.38 37.05
Recency 7 December 2017 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 295 Watt

TITAN V has a 19.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 18% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Pro SSG Radeon Pro SSG
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SMX2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3282 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 685 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.